Skip to main content

Back to the bad old days of the Soviet Union


The Russians are back to the bad old days......

The trial, currently underway, of the punk band, Pussy Riot, has all the hallmarks of what was the norm under the Soviet regime.

"Of all the bad feelings one can have about one’s own country, shame is the most painful. Righteous outrage motivates one to act; sadness breeds solidarity; even fear can bring people together. But shame not only makes you want to jump out of your skin, it also means you have already effectively jumped out of the skin that is your country.

I distinctly recall the first time I recognized the feeling of shame in myself. It was a bit over a year ago, when I watched a video of an American gay activist, Lt. Dan Choi, being grabbed and dragged off by the Moscow police just outside Red Square for attempting to take part in an illegal gay pride parade. I remember, too, thinking about what was causing me to feel ashamed: I was imagining many of my friends in other countries watching the video and thinking of me as living in a backward country.

This summer, that feeling is growing familiar. The ongoing trial of three members of Pussy Riot, the girl band that staged an anti-Putin “punk prayer service” in Moscow’s main cathedral, has been compared to the Spanish Inquisition, a witch hunt, and Stalinist show trials (I am guilty of that comparison, too). All of these comparisons give the Moscow court too much credit. The Inquisition, the witch hunters, and even Stalin’s executioners believed in their causes and fought passionately for them. What is going on in the Moscow courtroom today is a dispassionate, cynical travesty of justice.
 
Take the judge, for example. She appears to consider being possessed by the devil to be a valid medical diagnosis.  Or take the prosecutor, who demanded that the trial be closed to the public – as though the women’s performance had been a state secret. Or take the defense lawyer who, when the judge corrects him on inappropriate language, snaps, “Don’t tell me what to do.” Or take the court marshals, who try to kick members of the public out of the courtroom for turning their heads toward the window — through which they can see a protest erupting.

Or take the bomb threat on the fourth day of hearings. The building was evacuated while the mine squad swept it. As the lawyers, the witnesses and the journalists waited outside, the three defendants were left in the courthouse, where a bomb had supposedly been planted.

Or take what happened the next day. The defense was hoping to finally begin calling witnesses, but the court marshals did not allow most of the people on the defense list to enter the building. Then the judge ruled that they would not be called to testify because they were absent. The defense objected; the judge pretended not to hear.

Every day last week, front pages the world over — except Russia — carried headlines about the Pussy Riot trial. Several of those stories managed to communicate the tragedy of the situation: three young women, two of whom have young children, are facing years in jail for staging a peaceful protest. But I don’t think any of those stories really got across the ridiculous nature of what is passing for court proceedings in Moscow today. The trial is not even absurd — a quality that might have some appeal for the defendants’ artistic sensibilities. It is simply a very bad, half-hearted attempt at a show.

That makes me feel shame. But shame leads to alienation — which is exactly what the government officials want: for people like me to feel like outsiders at these proceedings and in this country. And that is the only thing that still gives me a shot at achieving righteous indignation".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...