Skip to main content

Iraq in danger of re-igniting

So much for the "success" of the Iraq War....as Iraqi politician Hassan al-Alawi warning of the country re-igniting.   So very typical of the Western media, the Iraqi politician's remarks were reported in the Arab press and not in the West.

"Many of the recent meetings held by Iraqi political leaders aimed at getting Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki removed from office took place at the Erbil home of veteran politician Hassan al-Alawi.

It is the Kurdish-Shia alliance that made Nouri al-Maliki prime minister and Massoud Barzani president of the Kurdistan region.Once at the forefront of those calling for the Baghdad parliament to convene to pass a vote of no-confidence in the government, the head of the al-Iraqiya al-Bayda bloc in parliament no longer supports the idea.


“If there were to be such a session, the speaker of parliament would be assaulted, and the members would split into two groups fighting each other with chairs and knives,” he told Al-Akhbar in an interview. “It would be a scandal for parliament which I would rather avoid.”





****



"Alawi warned that Iraq could be headed for a fresh bout of strife. “The fear now is of an intra-Shia war between the Sadrist current on one side and government forces and the Ahl al-Haq militia on the other, “ he said. “Intra-Shia conflict and the conflict within the political class make it easier for beneficiaries of the regional countries to intervene, and to detonate the situation.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...