Skip to main content

When you start banning books......

As we all know - and history has taught us - when you start banning books things are on a slippery slope.      It seems like the State of Arizona is still in the business of banning books, as this report from CommonDreams clearly shows.

"Arizona's racist move to ban ethnic studies programs - aka - real history including that of brown-skinned people - and a long list of "objectionable" books pertaining to same - aka any books they don't like, ranging from the seminal Rethinking Columbus to award-winning novels - may have backfired. Along with a legal fight to reinstate them, there are a host of other actions: Activist teachers have launched a month-long initiative - "They say shut it down. We say spread it around." - students are holding teach-ins and workshops, lists of the books are circulating, the American Library Association has blasted the move - "WHEREAS, 'The freedom to read is essential to our democracy... No society of free people can flourish that draws up lists of writers to whom it will not listen, whatever they may have to say.' - and commentators are declaring themselves understandably weary of "enduring fools."

Perhaps not coincidentally, another manifestation of racism still being alive and well in the USA emerges from this piece, also on CommonDreams:

"The surreal saga of Scott Henson, a journalist, political consultant and blogger - Grits for Breakfast and Huevos Rancheros - on the criminal justice system in Texas who was stopped by Austin police in nine patrol cars with flashing lights, handcuffed and questioned at length for walking his five-year-old granddaughter home from a roller-skating rink. Henson is white; his granddaughter is black. It's not the first time he has been stopped with her. Evidently, we - and most notably the police - have a long way to go before achieving a post-racial, un-paranoid, non-authoritarian America."



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...
6 comments
Read more