Skip to main content

It's full steam ahead for China

With world financial markets reeling, the US having just received a downgraded credit-rating in relation to long-term debt and anxiety around the globe about where we are all headed economically, an expert says that China is destined to remain steaming ahead at full speed.

"Ask the Nobel Prize-winning economist who has advised China on its latest five-year plan the question on every Australian economists' lips, and he does not flinch.

"How long have they got? How much longer can China's extraordinary explosion of economic growth continue," I ask Michael Spence down a phone line to Italy, where he lives six months of the year.

"I think the answer is something like two decades, in the later part of that they will start to slow down," he says ahead of his book tour of Australia to promote The Next Convergence - the Future of Economic Growth in a Multispeed World.

He is a good person to ask. As well as advising China on growth for the past four years, he has chaired the World Bank-sponsored Commission on Growth and Development, set up to distil all that is known about how to drive economic growth and cut poverty. His key insight about China is striking - that the sudden burst of growth that has revolutionised global economics and politics was the result of a conscious decision made by just a handful of people. Deng Xiaoping and a few comrades could have decided to throw the switch to growth later, perhaps even in 20 years; they could have decided to do it earlier, although not before Mao died and the Gang of Four were arrested in the late 1970s.

Deng and cronies decided first to allow the limited use of market prices for farmers selling production over and above what was required, saw the results were impressive, and then semi-secretly invited experts, including the then president of the World Bank, Robert McNamara, to give them advice on what to do next."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...