Skip to main content

Watch Bibi gee up the GOP

As if the Israelis aren't already cocking their collective noses at the world, Robert Dreyfus writing in The Nation says that with the GOP wins in the recent mid-term election, that Israeli PM Netanyahu will seek to gee up the Americans to attack, or provide "cover" for Israel attacking Iran. Listen out for the beat of drums of war coming out of Washington and Jerusalem!

"Those wondering if the November 2 elections, returning the House of Representatives to Republican control, will have any effect on US foreign policy might consider the discussion this morning at the Brookings Institution. Half a dozen Brookings experts, including one new scholar, neoconservative analyst Robert Kagan, pontificated on foreign policy during the second half of the Obama administration, taking into account the GOP gains in Congress and President Obama's weakened position.

Perhaps the most interesting insight came from Martin Indyk, Brookings vice president and director of its foreign policy program. Indyk, best known for being a decidedly pro-Israel official at the State Department, currently advises George Mitchell, the US special envoy for the Israel-Palestine tangle. Asked about Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Indyk said, "He is much more of a Republican than a Likudnik," meaning that Netanyahu closely identifies with the GOP and he has good relations with Republicans in Congress. Noting that Netanyahu recently stepped up his rhetoric calling for a military attack on Iran, Indyk suggested that Netanyahu was sending an unsubtle signal to Republicans to start talking up the issue.

What Netanyahu means, said Indyk, is to tell Republicans: "Come on, guys! It's time to get much tougher on Iran." He compared to Republican pressure on the Clinton administration over Iraq in the 1990s, when Newt Gingrich and others—alongside Ahmed Chalabi, the neoconservative darling who led the Iraqi National Congress—pushed Clinton to sign the Iraq Liberation Act. (There's a chance that the GOP, along with AIPAC, the Israel lobby, might push now for an Iran Liberation Act as a way of checkmating Obama's outreach to Iran.)".

See also this report "Eric Cantor Assures Netanyahu the GOP Majority Will Undermine Obama on Israel" on AlterNet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...
6 comments
Read more