Skip to main content

This doesn't figure...or how to juggle the figures

Whilst accountants don't wear eye-shades anymore and sit at high-desks with their green light-shades as they toil away working over and through the financial books, what to make of this seeming sleight of hand in accounting. Perhaps it's as simple as claiming...."the computer did it?"

Bloomberg [as reproduced in The SMH] explains:

"It will be a long time before General Motors can shake the stigma of being called Government Motors. Here's another nickname for the bailed-out car maker: Goodwill Motors.

Sometimes the wackiest accounting results are those driven by accounting rules themselves. Consider this: how could it be that one of GM's most valuable assets, listed at $US30.2 billion ($A32.57 billion), is the intangible asset known as goodwill, when it has been only a little more than a year since the company emerged from Chapter-11 bankruptcy protection?

That's the amount GM said its goodwill was worth on the June 30 balance sheet it filed last month as part of the registration statement for its planned initial public offering. By comparison, GM said its total equity was $US23.9 billion. So without the goodwill, which isn't saleable, the company's equity would be negative. This is hardly a sign of robust financial strength.

GM listed goodwill at zero a year earlier. It's as if a $US30.2 billion asset suddenly materialised out of thin air. In the upside-down world that is GM's balance sheet, that's exactly what happened.

Indeed, the company's goodwill supposedly is worth more than its property, plant and equipment, which GM listed at $US18.1 billion. The amount is about eight times the $US3.5 billion GM is paying to buy AmeriCredit Corp, the subprime auto lender. Another twist: GM said its goodwill would have been worth less had its creditworthiness been better. Talk about a head-scratcher."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...