Skip to main content

A mess

Who hasn't marvelled at those marvellous gorillas. Think of the movie "Gorillas in the Mist".

Jane Goodall has almost become a legend in her own lifetime in the work she has done in Africa with primates.

The Age reports on her visit to Melbourne Zoo yesterday:

"She is described variously as a scientist, a conservationist and a primatologist. But Jane Goodall has one simple label for the state of the Earth: a mess.

Overpopulation, pollution and the reckless use of fossil fuels, she says, are just some of the things that are poisoning the planet and threatening its creatures.

But despite the bleak outlook for the world, the 74-year-old Briton is encouraging people not to despair. "There's hope for the future, but only if we all play our part," she says.

Best known for her work with chimpanzees in Africa, Dr Goodall is in Melbourne as part of an Australian tour, speaking about worldwide efforts to save critically endangered species from extinction.

At Melbourne Zoo yesterday, she shared centre stage with the resident gorillas to help launch a mobile phone recycling campaign that will raise money for the primate conservation work carried out by the Jane Goodall Institute in Africa.

It is hoped the program will also lessen demand for coltan, a metal part for mobile phones that is mined in the Congo River basin and contributes to forest loss, affecting the habitat of threatened mountain gorillas and other animals.

"An awful lot's gone, but if we don't take care, an awful lot more will go until there's nothing left," she says.

Dr Goodall also said this week's release of the Red List of Endangered Species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature should serve as "a wake-up call for action" to help protect the world's most vulnerable species.

That list showed that 25% of the planet's mammals are under threat, with Australian mammals the most at risk in the developed world."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...