Skip to main content

Walled

It will be interesting to see what reaction is generated by a new book, "Walled" written by a veteran French-Israeli journalist, Sylvain Cypel, a senior editor at Le Monde.

It would be surprising if Cypel doesn't cop the usual flack of being accused of being a "self-hating Jew" and the like. It will be hard to claim, however, that the writer doesn't know anything about Israel or has no connection to it - thereby denying him he right, some would say, of criticising Israel.

SFGate.com [the San Francisco Chronicle] has a piece on the book and the issues it throws up:

"Veteran French-Israeli journalist Sylvain Cypel, now a senior editor at Le Monde, has channeled his intimate familiarity with Israel into a penetrating critique of Israeli political culture, with particular emphasis on the manifest immorality of occupation. Erudite yet accessible, "Walled" is an impassioned plea for Israelis to liberate themselves from the self-serving view that Palestinians are somehow uniquely undeserving of independence, and to resist the "colonialist and ethnicist tropisms" that permeate Israeli political discourse.

Synthesizing the findings of Israel's New Historians, Cypel begins by observing that "for the Palestinians, 1948 was what we would now, after the recent war in the Balkans, call a vast ethnic cleansing," and that "nearly half of this expulsion was carried out even before the Arab states attacked Israel." The author describes the Six-Day War of 1967, when Israel attacked its neighbors and seized control of East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, as "the first of the modern preventive wars," except that it was far from certain that Egypt ever intended to attack Israel."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...