Skip to main content

The greatest speech

"Radio National invites listeners to name the greatest speech. Six thousand respond, their hundreds of nominations including Ronald Reagan, Yitzhak Rabin, William Pitt the Younger, Vaclav Havel, Bill Clinton, Salvador Allende, Mahatma Gandhi, Arundhati Roy and Thomas More.

Dolores Ibárruri, a hero of the Spanish Civil War, is remembered for her “Fascism shall not pass”; Patrick Henry, a leader of the American Revolution, for “Give me liberty or give me death.”

The last words of the Irish patriot Robert Emmet ring out – “I am going to my cold and silent grave”, as does Nelson Mandela’s triumphant “Let freedom ring”. Charlie Chaplin’s closing speech from The Great Dictator is nominated, as is Billy Hughes’s funeral oration for Henry Lawson. There are two nominations for Pauline Hanson’s maiden speech.

I’d forgotten the heartbreaking words of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in honour of the Anzacs: “You, the mothers, who sent their sons from faraway countries, wipe away your tears; your sons are now lying in our bosom and are in peace. After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.”

Bob Carr’s Coogee speech for the victims of the Bali bombing is nominated, as is John Howard’s eulogy for Steve Irwin. And the speech Howard never gave – saying sorry for the stolen generation – is celebrated via his namesake; you’ll recall the actor John Howard saying sorry, in words by John Clarke for The Games. And there is support for Peter Sellers for his all-party, all¿purpose speech of political bullshit from a 1960s LP.

The Eugene Goossens Hall at the ABC serves as the tally room for the big announcement of the top 10. Like Kerry O’Brien on election night, I am surrounded by experts. John Bell, artistic director of The Bell Shakespeare Company, provides some readings – and observations on the rhythms, syntax and passion of a great speech."

So begins Phillip Adams' column in The Australian about the fascinating competition run by ABC Radio National. The contenders and speeches submitted were surprising - no less so than some of the winners. Read all about it here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...