Skip to main content

My Israel Question

The recently released book, My Israel Question [by Antony Loewenstein - published by MUP] has already garnered considerable favorable comment and reviews around the country. It is a testimony to the integrity of the book and the debate that it has opened out that within 10 days of being on the bookshelves of shops around Australia, it is already on substantial back-order and in the process of being reprinted for a 2nd edition.

Interestingly, one voice, in particular, has been out there loudly villifying the author personally - yet singularly avoiding the subject-matter of the book. Carping and misrepresention of facts - yes! Truthful and accurate - no! It's hardly surprising that that shrill voice is that of Ted Lapkin of AIJAC, an organisation consisting of a cabal of who-knows-who [and supported by whom?] who fondly cling to and advocate positions alien to any right-thinking, fair or decent human being. By the way that is the same Ted Lapkin who presented so appallingly on the ABC "Lateline" program recently.

"AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and its much smaller Australian counterpart AIJAC, are among the most professionally skilled and successful political lobbying organisations in the world. They are not, as far as I know, representative elected bodies of the Jewish communities in these countries. We don’t know where most of their funding comes from: although I am sure they could if pressed produce long lists of generous local donors. More significantly we don’t know to whom they are accountable for policy direction.

The AIJAC website is quite modestly circumspect about its agenda and achievements. Not so the AIPAC website in the USA, which proudly boasts that it is “America’s pro-Israel lobby”, and “the most important organisation affecting America’s relationship with Israel”, and today has “100,000 members across all 50 states who are at the forefront of the most vexing issues facing Israel today”. It goes on:

AIPAC lobbyists meet every member of Congress and cover every hearing on Capitol Hill that touches on the U.S.-Israel relationship. AIPAC policy experts each day review hundreds of periodicals, journals, speeches and reports and meet regularly with the most innovative foreign policy thinkers in order to track and analyze events and trends. In addition, AIPAC activists and staff work with key journalists throughout the country, offering information and insight that helps ensure accuracy and context for the myriad news stories that focus on issues affecting the U.S.-Israel relationship.

It is no wonder that US and Israeli government policies are almost always in lockstep. AIPAC is a massive, skilfully directed, permanent lobbying operation in the US. Australia is a much softer target; and the AIJAC needs far less manpower and resources to achieve similarly successful results with the Howard Government and Labor opposition. Nevertheless, AIJAC is a class lobbying act too, judging by its results here."

So writes former senior Australian diplomat Tony Kevin (who served in DFAT and the Prime Minister's Department between 1968 and 1998, with his last postings at ambassador level in Poland and Cambodia), is the author of the prizewinning A Certain Maritime Incident – the Sinking of SIEV X ( Scribe Publications, Melbourne, 2004).

Read the complete piece by Kevin on ON LINE opinion here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...