Skip to main content

Nominee Alito - and Australia?

The US Senate is presently "examing" the nomination by George Bush of Samuel Alito to the US Supreme Court.

If reports out of the US are correct there are many in favour of his appointment [he is very, very conservative to say the least - if not right-wing] if for no other reason that he is pro-life and all that entails. Supporters see the possibility of Roe v Wade being overturned.

On the other hand, detractors of Alito make out a compelling case for his nomination to be defeated. Read this article from AlterNet by Martha Burk [of Ms Magazine] on how Alito's appointment to the Supreme Court would most likely set back the interests of women.

We should not think that what happens in the US will not have some sort of ripple-effect in Australia. Australian courts do not follow US courts as a rule but it is the conservative nature of the Bench in Australia, and all that flows from that, which cannot be ignored. We are already seeing religious groups and vocal minority groups [think the Family First Party!] make their presence felt - to the detriment of the wider Australian community. For example, appointments to the Bench will doubtlessly come under closer scrutiny by those with vested religious or like-minded conservative interests.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I just want to use one example to point out what I think is a flaw in your logic

One of the arguments against conservative judges (though I'm not sure if this argument has been made against Alito yet) is that they would overturn affirmitive action legislation.

The more liberal members of the US Supreme Court have supported such legislation. Now isn't that pandering to a vocal minority group?

What is the role of a judge. Is it to strictly interpert the law as passed by the legislature, or is it to examine the wider social concerns of issue beyond the letter of the law? Are judges there to protect the rights of the majority or the minority?

So maybe it's less of a flaw that I'm pointing out, more of an implied shortcoming. If judges are not to favour particular minority groups, you can't pick and choose which side of the political spectrum they fall on. I know there are much more technical legal questions to be answered here, but I'm trying to look at the underlying philosophy

I ask, if Alito is not a sutible candidate, then who is? Or what do you think the qualities of a judge should be?

I do understand the point behind the Alternet article, after all why have many judges on the highest court if not to bring in varying points of view based on different life experiences into the final decision. However, for what I think is a more balanced view on Alito check out this article in Time
January 12, 2006 2:54 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...
Post a Comment
Read more

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t...
Post a Comment
Read more