Skip to main content

Newspapers: Dying by a thousand cuts

We all know that newspapers, as we have come to know them, are a dying thing.   Some cities around the world no longer even have a daily newspaper.     One can't be left with a distinct impression that newspaper proprietors just didn't see the changing times and how people access news.

From mUmBRELLA....

"Firstly, that in five to ten years the world-famous newspaper will probably cease to exist altogether in its physical form. So too will the likes of The Guardian, the third biggest English language site in the world and, in my opinion, currently the greatest paper on the planet. 

The Guardian does phenomenally well online, with 90 million unique users every month. Compare this with the number of hard copies sold each day… less than 200,000. Readership has halved over the last decade and if that trend continues, the paper will lose its last reader by the end of the decade. 


A paperless Guardian is now inevitable, as it is for every serious newspaper from The New York Times to the Straits Times in Singapore.

One Singapore newspaper staffer told me that it was time editors faced up to reality and moved to paperless operations sooner rather than later.


He said: “News will always be here it is just the form of distribution which has changed.
“Newspapers would be much better transferring to digital the huge amounts spent on news print, multi-million dollar printing presses, distribution networks, lorries, vans and drivers.


“Executives appear relentlessly attached to the distribution system which is a ball and chain dragging them under. Do you really think people will be reading hard copies of newspapers in ten years? They will be reading news stories on Google glasses or some yet-to-be-invented device. That’s the reality.


Circulation is crashing and newspapers will have to come to terms with the fact that they will never make the kinds of profits they once did because their monopoly has been busted.”


The second point is staffing levels. They cannot be sustained at current levels.


To run its print and online operations, The Guardian employs 1,600 people worldwide, including 600 journalists and 150 digital developers, designers and engineers.


The newsroom is simply too big for what is now effectively a digital newspaper and it’s no surprise it has lost money for nine years running.


The New York Times also needs to address this issue. Its newsroom stands at around 1,150 people."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Donald T: First seduced..... then betrayed!

All those supporters of Trump - who, heaven's only knows, got him headed for the White House - are in a for more than a rude awakening and shock.   Whatever Trump "promised" is just not going to happen....as Paul Krugman so clearly spells out in his latest op-ed piece "Seduced and Betrayed by Donald Trump" in The New York Times.

"Donald Trump won the Electoral College (though not the popular vote) on the strength of overwhelming support from working-class whites, who feel left behind by a changing economy and society. And they’re about to get their reward — the same reward that, throughout Mr. Trump’s career, has come to everyone who trusted his good intentions. Think Trump University.

Yes, the white working class is about to be betrayed.

The evidence of that coming betrayal is obvious in the choice of an array of pro-corporate, anti-labor figures for key positions. In particular, the most important story of the week — seriously, people, stop focusing on Trum…

Snooping..... at its worst

The Brits have just brought in legislation which allows for unprecedented "snooping" in a Western democracy - says Edward Snowden.   Let truthdig explain....

"On Tuesday, the United Kingdom instated the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, a piece of legislation described by whistleblower Edward Snowden as “the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy.”

The law, informally known as the “Snooper’s Charter,” spent over a year in Parliament before it was passed. The Guardian reported:

"The new surveillance law requires web and phone companies to store everyone’s web browsing histories for 12 months and give the police, security services and official agencies unprecedented access to the data.

It also provides the security services and police with new powers to hack into computers and phones and to collect communications data in bulk. The law requires judges to sign off police requests to view journalists’ call and web records, but the measure has been descri…

A "Muslim Register"

Outrageous is the word which immediately comes to mind - the idea of a  Muslim Register which Trump has floated.     And how and by or through whom would this Registry comes into being?    Let The Intercept explain.....

"Every American corporation, from the largest conglomerate to the smallest firm, should ask itself right now: Will we do business with the Trump administration to further its most extreme, draconian goals? Or will we resist?

This question is perhaps most important for the country’s tech companies, which are particularly valuable partners for a budding authoritarian. The Intercept contacted nine of the most prominent such firms, from Facebook to Booz Allen Hamilton, to ask if they would sell their services to help create a national Muslim registry, an idea recently resurfaced by Donald Trump’s transition team. Only Twitter said no.

Shortly after the election, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty wrote a personal letter to President-elect Trump in which she offered her congratulation…