Skip to main content

Call for humanity

From Wired Blog Network:

"Despite the pinpoint targeting, despite the satellite-guided, pint-sized bombs, despite the lawyers in the air operations center and the patient behavioral profiling, American airstrikes in Afghanistan still continue to kill civilians at an alarming rate; more than three dozen were allegedly slain yesterday in a strike on a wedding party in Kandahar province. Every errant attack undermines U.S. efforts to stabilize the country, and gives the Taliban another propaganda win. But the air war is showing no signs of slowing down -- in fact, airstrikes are up more than 30 percent this year.

So what can U.S. commanders do about the civilian death toll? A well-connected outsider has an out-of-the-box idea for the new administration. "One thing President Obama can do immediately: Create by executive order a high-level position at the Pentagon dedicated to the human costs of war," Sarah Holewinski, executive director of the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict, tells DANGER ROOM.

'The Pentagon is a sprawling bureaucracy, but with all that manpower, there is no one place, no one person specifically paying attention to civilian casualties. Leadership from the top on this very contentious issue is absolutely necessary, lest U.S. forces continue to make more enemies than friends. The Pentagon position would assess the potential human cost of war before any shots are fired, make sure proven techniques to avoid civilians are in place and constantly improved, maintain proper investigative and statistical data on civilian harm in combat zones, and ensure prompt compensation to any civilians unintentionally harmed by U.S. combat operations.'

That may sound like a far-out idea from deep within Dennis Kucinich-land. But CIVIC is seriously plugged into the military. It contributed to the Army's handbook on escalation of force procedures, and has a network of friends in uniform. And before her death in 2005, CIVIC founder Marla Ruzicka successfully lobbied for U.S. government assistance to Afghan and Iraqi families harmed during military operations.

But in a war where enemies pop up at a moment's notice, and fade into the background almost as quick, can the military afford to have another layer of bureacracy, like the one CIVIC is proposing? Can it afford not to?"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pentagon's eye-popping spending....and waste!

Only a gigantic bureaucracy could get away with spending of such dimensions - and the amazing waste involved in part of that ginormous spend.   Think US Pentagon..... "From spending $150 million on private villas for a handful of personnel in Afghanistan to blowing $2.7 billion on an air surveillance balloon that doesn’t work, the latest revelations of waste at the Pentagon are just the most recent howlers in a long line of similar stories stretching back at least five decades.  Other hot-off-the-presses examples would include the Army’s purchase of helicopter gears worth $500 each for $8,000 each and the accumulation of billions of dollars' worth of weapons components that will never be used. And then there’s the one that would have to be everyone’s favorite Pentagon waste story: the spending of $50,000 to investigate the bomb-detecting capabilities of African elephants. (And here’s a shock: they didn’t turn out to be that great!) The elephant research, of course, represe...

Video: Israel demolishing a Bedouin village

From Mondoweiss - Israel's supposed "most moral army in the world", the IDF, engaged in immoral, and according to international law, illegal action.... "Israeli forces have demolished every home in the Bedouin village of Khirbet Taha in the northern West Bank district of Nablus during three separate demolitions since the start of the year. Unlike most Bedouin villages, the residents in Khirbet Taha own their own land. However that land falls in Area C, territory in the occupied West Bank under full Israeli control. The village’s only school was also destroyed, leaving children to study in a dilapidated 100-year-old mosque — the only structure left standing in the village. According the United Nations, Israel has demolished half as many Palestinian buildings in the first few months of 2016, as they had in all of 2015. In February alone, the UN found that more Palestinians homes were destroyed than any other month since 2009, when the organization began its docum...

What does a no-fly zone actually mean?

As some countries consider imposing a no-fly zone in relation to Libya, the pertinent question must be what does that mean and entail? FP provides the answers: "It depends on the circumstances. There are two primary types of no-fly zones imposed by air forces. The first is imposed by one military over another, while the two sides are at war. In practice, this type of no-fly zone amounts to a warning from one side that it will engage the other's aircraft if they are spotted in a given territory. The second type, more applicable to the situation in Libya, is when an outside power possessing overwhelming air superiority restricts flights over a given country in order to discourage an internal conflict or humanitarian crisis. This is a relatively recent tactic, which was used most famously in Bosnia and Iraq during the 1990s. No-fly zones are often a compromise in situations where the international community is demanding a response to ongoing violence, but full military interven...