Skip to main content

Gold, silver and brazen

And you thought that the award of the Olympic Games to a city was purely based on the merits of the particular contender!

FP Foreign Policy in a piece "Gold, silver and brazen" explains the real underlying reasons for a winner to hold the Olympics:

"The International Olympic Committee (IOC), the 115-member body responsible for choosing the host city for the Olympic Games, fancies that it can separate sports from politics in its selection process. The choice of repressive China as host of the 2008 Summer Games seemed to demonstrate the flaw in that logic. And in July, when the IOC awarded the Russian resort town of Sochi the honor of hosting the 2014 Winter Olympic Games, the committee proved once again that logic is not its strong suit.

The IOC’s insistence on overlooking a country’s political environment is becoming increasingly difficult to justify. No matter how much IOC members delude themselves, national leaders are bound to use the Olympics for political ends. At the 1936 Olympics in Berlin, the Nazis used the Games to trump up German nationalism during a time of pervasive depression. Although Sochi 2014 is a far cry from Berlin 1936, one basic comparison holds: In each case, an illiberal government with something to prove managed to co-opt the Olympics in order to reclaim a severely damaged “national identity.” And it did so with the help of the IOC.

Already, millions of Russians have interpreted the committee’s decision as a stamp of approval from the international community. “Sochi’s winning bid for the 2014 Olympics is yet another vivid confirmation of the authority of our country in the world arena,” crowed Mikhail Kamynin, spokesman for Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, shortly after the IOC announced the winner."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading the Chilcot Inquiry Report more closely

Most commentary on the Chilcot Inquiry Report of and associated with the Iraq War, has been "lifted" from the Executive Summary.   The Intercept has actually gone and dug into the Report, with these revelations : "THE CHILCOT REPORT, the U.K.’s official inquiry into its participation in the Iraq War, has finally been released after seven years of investigation. Its executive summary certainly makes former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who led the British push for war, look terrible. According to the report, Blair made statements about Iraq’s nonexistent chemical, biological, and nuclear programs based on “what Mr. Blair believed” rather than the intelligence he had been given. The U.K. went to war despite the fact that “diplomatic options had not been exhausted.” Blair was warned by British intelligence that terrorism would “increase in the event of war, reflecting intensified anti-US/anti-Western sentiment in the Muslim world, including among Muslim communities in the

Robert Fisk's predictions for the Middle East in 2013

There is no gain-saying that Robert Fisk, fiercely independent and feisty to boot, is the veteran journalist and author covering the Middle East. Who doesn't he know or hasn't he met over the years in reporting from Beirut - where he lives?  In his latest op-ed piece for The Independent he lays out his predictions for the Middle East for 2013. Read the piece in full, here - well worthwhile - but an extract... "Never make predictions in the Middle East. My crystal ball broke long ago. But predicting the region has an honourable pedigree. “An Arab movement, newly-risen, is looming in the distance,” a French traveller to the Gulf and Baghdad wrote in 1883, “and a race hitherto downtrodden will presently claim its due place in the destinies of Islam.” A year earlier, a British diplomat in Jeddah confided that “it is within my knowledge... that the idea of freedom does at present agitate some minds even in Mecca...” So let’s say this for 2013: the “Arab Awakening” (the t

An unpalatable truth!

Quinoa has for the last years been the "new" food on the block for foodies. Known for its health properties, foodies the world over have taken to it. Many restaurants have added it to their menu. But, as this piece " Can vegans stomach the unpalatable truth about quinoa? " from The Guardian so clearly details, the cost to Bolivians and Peruvians - from where quinoa hails - has been substantial. "Not long ago, quinoa was just an obscure Peruvian grain you could only buy in wholefood shops. We struggled to pronounce it (it's keen-wa, not qui-no-a), yet it was feted by food lovers as a novel addition to the familiar ranks of couscous and rice. Dieticians clucked over quinoa approvingly because it ticked the low-fat box and fitted in with government healthy eating advice to "base your meals on starchy foods". Adventurous eaters liked its slightly bitter taste and the little white curls that formed around the grains. Vegans embraced quinoa as