One can't help be concerned about the proposed so-called counter-terrorism laws. The Government isn't even prepared to put them "out there" for scrutiny and discussion. Why not? Debate in the Parliament will doubtlessly be cut to the barest time [will the Opposition even take a stand?] and all Coalition members will simply say yea to everything. How comforting to know that not one Coalition member has the wit or intelligence [or should that be guts?] to challenge what is afoot here. Read the ever-wonderful Richard Carlton in the SMH today [below] on his take on the proposed legislation. People MUST become motivated to object - long and loudly!
"INCREASINGLY under the Howard Government, the bureaucracy is a law unto itself. The Immigration Department was clearly out of control, drunk with power, inflamed by the dog-whistle xenophobia of "we will decide who comes to this country and the manner in which they come".
The Commonwealth Ombudsman revealed this week that one poor wretch might have been wrongfully held in immigration detention for seven years, another for as long as six years, and another dozen or so for as long as three years.
All this under the ministerial supervision of the whited sepulchre, Philip Ruddock, who, as Attorney-General, will now be in charge of banging terrorist "suspects" away, indefinitely, without trial.
Ruddock and the Government have learnt one thing, however. This time around, secrecy will be enforced by such savage penalties - a maximum of five years' jail - that no wrongful detention will ever be uncovered by the media or anyone else. The sop of judicial oversight is a hollow farce."
"INCREASINGLY under the Howard Government, the bureaucracy is a law unto itself. The Immigration Department was clearly out of control, drunk with power, inflamed by the dog-whistle xenophobia of "we will decide who comes to this country and the manner in which they come".
The Commonwealth Ombudsman revealed this week that one poor wretch might have been wrongfully held in immigration detention for seven years, another for as long as six years, and another dozen or so for as long as three years.
All this under the ministerial supervision of the whited sepulchre, Philip Ruddock, who, as Attorney-General, will now be in charge of banging terrorist "suspects" away, indefinitely, without trial.
Ruddock and the Government have learnt one thing, however. This time around, secrecy will be enforced by such savage penalties - a maximum of five years' jail - that no wrongful detention will ever be uncovered by the media or anyone else. The sop of judicial oversight is a hollow farce."
Comments