Skip to main content

An "interesting" situation

The reports in relation to the conviction of David Hicks refer to his "confession" and, in effect, his withdrawal of any allegations that he was tortured or abused. In addition, it has been said by the prosecutor that if Hicks did not genuinely acknowledge that he was tortured - and only made the admission to secure a release from Gitmo - he might be charged with perjury.

Whilst Australian Government ministers are already this morning slamming Hicks as the "worst of the worst", that the whole "trial" and conviction and sentence of Hicks has been a farce the last days is highlighted when one reads this in the NY Times [dealing with the Hicks matter]:

"In the telephone interview on Saturday from Adelaide, Mr. Hicks’s father said there were other aspects of the plea bargain that troubled him. It was clear to him, based on his last conversation with his son at Guantánamo last week, that he was pleading guilty in order to get out of detention there. “He told me he’d had it, he couldn’t take it any longer.”

Mr. Hicks also said he did not understand how his son could say he was not abused, noting that David had included descriptions of abusive treatment in an affidavit filed with a British court, in support of an application for citizenship.

Among the episodes recounted in the document was one that he said occurred before he arrived at Guantánamo. In a 10-hour interrogation, he said he was “hit in the back of the head with the butt of a rifle several times (hard enough to knock me over), slapped in the back of the head, kicked, stepped on, and spat on.”

How to reconcile all of this? Look out for the spin from Lord Downer of Baghdad and the rest of the increasingly pathetic and motley lot of Australian ministers, starting from the top with the PM.

Comments

Anonymous said…
it's easy to despise politicians, any one would, who wasn't one.

i used to despise hyenas too, but one day i realized that wildebeest could eradicate hyenas in a day, if they wished. greater numbers, bigger size, horns and hooves- piece of cake.

so too with civilians- they could make pollies obsolete by simply taking on the role and responsibilities of citizens. but, like the wildebeest, they don't. instead they watch footy, or complain about the government.

the general field theory of politics is quite simple: "you get the government you deserve."

Popular posts from this blog

Whatever democracy the Palestinians had is dying

Almost a desperate cry from a well-known, respected and sober moderate Palestinian.

Mustafa Barghouthi is secretary-general of the Palestinian National Initiative and a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council. He was a candidate for the Palestinian presidency in 2005.

He writes in a piece "The Slow Death of Palestinian Democracy" on FP:

"Palestinian municipal elections were supposed to be held last week. Instead, they were canceled. A statement released by the Palestinian Authority claimed the cancellation was "in order to pave the way for a successful end to the siege on Gaza and for continued efforts at unity" between Hamas, which governs the Gaza Strip, and the government in the West Bank.

The cancellation of this election was an unjustified, unlawful, and unacceptable act. It damages democratic rights and makes a mockery of the interests of the Palestinian people.

But this is far more than an internal Palestinian issue. The only lasting peace between Isr…

Big Brother alive and well in the USA in 2007

The so-called "war on terror" has shown itself up in a multitude of manifestations. The most dangerous thing has been governments using the "excuse" of the war to restrict certain civil liberties, allowing government agencies to pursue a variety of things that they would otherwise would not - and should not - be allowed to do and gathering, and retaining, a variety of information on its citizens.

The Washington Post reports on the latest incursions into civil liberties of all Americans:

"The U.S. government is collecting electronic records on the travel habits of millions of Americans who fly, drive or take cruises abroad, retaining data on the persons with whom they travel or plan to stay, the personal items they carry during their journeys, and even the books that travelers have carried, according to documents obtained by a group of civil liberties advocates and statements by government officials.

The personal travel records are meant to be stored for as lo…