Skip to main content

An "interesting" situation

The reports in relation to the conviction of David Hicks refer to his "confession" and, in effect, his withdrawal of any allegations that he was tortured or abused. In addition, it has been said by the prosecutor that if Hicks did not genuinely acknowledge that he was tortured - and only made the admission to secure a release from Gitmo - he might be charged with perjury.

Whilst Australian Government ministers are already this morning slamming Hicks as the "worst of the worst", that the whole "trial" and conviction and sentence of Hicks has been a farce the last days is highlighted when one reads this in the NY Times [dealing with the Hicks matter]:

"In the telephone interview on Saturday from Adelaide, Mr. Hicks’s father said there were other aspects of the plea bargain that troubled him. It was clear to him, based on his last conversation with his son at Guantánamo last week, that he was pleading guilty in order to get out of detention there. “He told me he’d had it, he couldn’t take it any longer.”

Mr. Hicks also said he did not understand how his son could say he was not abused, noting that David had included descriptions of abusive treatment in an affidavit filed with a British court, in support of an application for citizenship.

Among the episodes recounted in the document was one that he said occurred before he arrived at Guantánamo. In a 10-hour interrogation, he said he was “hit in the back of the head with the butt of a rifle several times (hard enough to knock me over), slapped in the back of the head, kicked, stepped on, and spat on.”

How to reconcile all of this? Look out for the spin from Lord Downer of Baghdad and the rest of the increasingly pathetic and motley lot of Australian ministers, starting from the top with the PM.


Anonymous said…
it's easy to despise politicians, any one would, who wasn't one.

i used to despise hyenas too, but one day i realized that wildebeest could eradicate hyenas in a day, if they wished. greater numbers, bigger size, horns and hooves- piece of cake.

so too with civilians- they could make pollies obsolete by simply taking on the role and responsibilities of citizens. but, like the wildebeest, they don't. instead they watch footy, or complain about the government.

the general field theory of politics is quite simple: "you get the government you deserve."

Popular posts from this blog

Donald T: First seduced..... then betrayed!

All those supporters of Trump - who, heaven's only knows, got him headed for the White House - are in a for more than a rude awakening and shock.   Whatever Trump "promised" is just not going to Paul Krugman so clearly spells out in his latest op-ed piece "Seduced and Betrayed by Donald Trump" in The New York Times.

"Donald Trump won the Electoral College (though not the popular vote) on the strength of overwhelming support from working-class whites, who feel left behind by a changing economy and society. And they’re about to get their reward — the same reward that, throughout Mr. Trump’s career, has come to everyone who trusted his good intentions. Think Trump University.

Yes, the white working class is about to be betrayed.

The evidence of that coming betrayal is obvious in the choice of an array of pro-corporate, anti-labor figures for key positions. In particular, the most important story of the week — seriously, people, stop focusing on Trum…

Snooping..... at its worst

The Brits have just brought in legislation which allows for unprecedented "snooping" in a Western democracy - says Edward Snowden.   Let truthdig explain....

"On Tuesday, the United Kingdom instated the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, a piece of legislation described by whistleblower Edward Snowden as “the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy.”

The law, informally known as the “Snooper’s Charter,” spent over a year in Parliament before it was passed. The Guardian reported:

"The new surveillance law requires web and phone companies to store everyone’s web browsing histories for 12 months and give the police, security services and official agencies unprecedented access to the data.

It also provides the security services and police with new powers to hack into computers and phones and to collect communications data in bulk. The law requires judges to sign off police requests to view journalists’ call and web records, but the measure has been descri…

A "Muslim Register"

Outrageous is the word which immediately comes to mind - the idea of a  Muslim Register which Trump has floated.     And how and by or through whom would this Registry comes into being?    Let The Intercept explain.....

"Every American corporation, from the largest conglomerate to the smallest firm, should ask itself right now: Will we do business with the Trump administration to further its most extreme, draconian goals? Or will we resist?

This question is perhaps most important for the country’s tech companies, which are particularly valuable partners for a budding authoritarian. The Intercept contacted nine of the most prominent such firms, from Facebook to Booz Allen Hamilton, to ask if they would sell their services to help create a national Muslim registry, an idea recently resurfaced by Donald Trump’s transition team. Only Twitter said no.

Shortly after the election, IBM CEO Ginni Rometty wrote a personal letter to President-elect Trump in which she offered her congratulation…